"whodunit" <whodunit@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:h9ebgu$61l$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> Anim8rFSK wrote:
> > In article <4cnkb59t6it5hru1dpa65ntt2iaiud72oj@4ax.com>,
> > John <BigBlueWre@kingCrew.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yikes! Sky have just sprung this one on me....
> >>
> >> Next Tuesday at 8? On Sky 1HD?
> >>
> >> Does that mean its not on regular SD Sky 1?
> >>
> >> Also, Since the end of SG-1 & Atlantis I've not really kept up to
> >> date with any direct to disc stargate movies. Can anyone tell me which
> >> ones I may have missed? Think I have a couple but I could have missed
> >> some.
> >
> > There are 2; if you have 2, you have 'em all.
> >> This whole Stargate Universe thing what exactly is it? Is it
> >> continuation of anything else or just completely new and separate?
> >
> > Remember the 200th ep of SG1, when they were exploring bad ideas on how
> > to make a Stargate movie, and one of them was SG-90210 with angst
ridden
> > young people on a spaceship, lit by a 15w bulb, having nothing to do
> > with Stargates?
> >
> > Somebody didn't realize that was supposed to be a BAD idea and made it
> > into SGU.
> >
> > I'd have rather seen the puppets. 
> >
> "THIS IS WHAT WE DO!!!!" ;-)
>
> Silver lining is that the 'real' SG stars are supposed to show up at
> times somehow, maybe as holograms? Not sure.
Meanwhile, the military's real "stargate" project was really psychic
"remote viewing" experiments. How's that for misdirection?