Re: 3rd Season Heroes - Eclipse 2 - 5 star poll - SPOILERS AHOY !

On Dec 1, 11:31*pm, "George Avalos" <georgeaval...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Eclipse 2"
> 12-1-08 Heroes
>
> 5 stars (pinhole)
>
> 0-1 stars (sunglasses)
>
> -George

4.0

really liked this one. i'm finally coming around to the matt/daphe
relationship being realistic.

so elle isn't going to be sylar's baby mama?

now i want to know the point of hiro taking claire back to see his
father give claire to hrg.

and again we see where claire got her stupid (though she's wising up)
gene from. nathan patrelli is a putz. of course i was irked at peter
for not pointing out (iirc we still have future peter here) what
happens in the future when anyone can have powers.

Penni

broughps@aol.com wrote:
> On Dec 1, 11:31 pm, "George Avalos" <georgeaval...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Eclipse 2"
>> 12-1-08 Heroes
>>
>> 5 stars (pinhole)
>>
>> 0-1 stars (sunglasses)
>>
>> -George
>
> 4.0
>
> really liked this one. i'm finally coming around to the matt/daphe
> relationship being realistic.
>
> so elle isn't going to be sylar's baby mama?

They've got good chemistry when they're not trying to `out-evil' each other.

> now i want to know the point of hiro taking claire back to see his
> father give claire to hrg.

The gang thought it might help to get Hiro's memory back.

> and again we see where claire got her stupid (though she's wising up)
> gene from. nathan patrelli is a putz. of course i was irked at peter
> for not pointing out (iirc we still have future peter here) what
> happens in the future when anyone can have powers.

You think Nathan would have believed him?

"broughps@aol.com" <broughps@aol.com> wrote in news:9dacc397-c6ef-4836-
b9b4-8ab5184fd224@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com:

> so elle isn't going to be sylar's baby mama?

Not anymore it would seem. Tho we're not 100% sure what he did, if he
finished, or if he stopped and spared her life.

> now i want to know the point of hiro taking claire back to see his
> father give claire to hrg.

I'm sure it will be seen next week

> and again we see where claire got her stupid (though she's wising up)
> gene from. nathan patrelli is a putz. of course i was irked at peter
> for not pointing out (iirc we still have future peter here) what
> happens in the future when anyone can have powers.

Future Peter is dead.

Michelle Steiner wrote:
> In article <Xns9B685B9D5570mdhalbrookyahoocom@140.99.99.130 >,
> "M. Halbrook" <mdhalbrook@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> so elle isn't going to be sylar's baby mama?
>> Not anymore it would seem. Tho we're not 100% sure what he did, if
>> he finished, or if he stopped and spared her life.
>
> I don't see why he would need to examine her brain; he already got her
> power/ability.

The addiction/hunger came back?

Scríobh "broughps@aol.com" <broughps@aol.com>:
>
>and again we see where claire got her stupid (though she's wising up)
>gene from. nathan patrelli is a putz. of course i was irked at peter
>for not pointing out (iirc we still have future peter here) what
>happens in the future when anyone can have powers.

As I remember it, we've had present Peter ever since the bank heist,
when future Peter popped him out of the body he was trapped in. Future
Peter took present Peter to the future to show him what would happen,
future Peter was killed, and present Peter returned to the present
alone.

--
'Donegal: Up Here It's Different'
© Féachadóir

suzee wrote:
> Michelle Steiner wrote:
>> In article <Xns9B685B9D5570mdhalbrookyahoocom@140.99.99.130 >,
>> "M. Halbrook" <mdhalbrook@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> so elle isn't going to be sylar's baby mama?
>>> Not anymore it would seem. Tho we're not 100% sure what he did, if
>>> he finished, or if he stopped and spared her life.
>>
>> I don't see why he would need to examine her brain; he already got her
>> power/ability.
>
> The addiction/hunger came back?

I thought it was pretty obvious he was punishing her for her
involvement, revealed by HRG. He doesn't have an addiction.

--
DJensen

DJensen wrote:
> suzee wrote:
>> Michelle Steiner wrote:
>>> In article <Xns9B685B9D5570mdhalbrookyahoocom@140.99.99.130 >,
>>> "M. Halbrook" <mdhalbrook@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> so elle isn't going to be sylar's baby mama?
>>>> Not anymore it would seem. Tho we're not 100% sure what he did, if
>>>> he finished, or if he stopped and spared her life.
>>>
>>> I don't see why he would need to examine her brain; he already got
>>> her power/ability.
>>
>> The addiction/hunger came back?
>
> I thought it was pretty obvious he was punishing her for her
> involvement, revealed by HRG. He doesn't have an addiction.

Oh yes, that would make sense; he wasn't happy about her leading him on
when they first met.

Féachadóir wrote:
> Scríobh "broughps@aol.com" <broughps@aol.com>:
>> and again we see where claire got her stupid (though she's wising up)
>> gene from. nathan patrelli is a putz. of course i was irked at peter
>> for not pointing out (iirc we still have future peter here) what
>> happens in the future when anyone can have powers.
>
> As I remember it, we've had present Peter ever since the bank heist,
> when future Peter popped him out of the body he was trapped in. Future
> Peter took present Peter to the future to show him what would happen,
> future Peter was killed, and present Peter returned to the present
> alone.

But still, present Peter got to some of the future where people with
powers got carried away with them.

Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> wrote in news:michelle-
D7A95D.10181502122008@mara100-84.onlink.net:

>> > so elle isn't going to be sylar's baby mama?
>>
>> Not anymore it would seem. Tho we're not 100% sure what he did, if
>> he finished, or if he stopped and spared her life.
>
> I don't see why he would need to examine her brain; he already got her
> power/ability.

Why did Peter in the future need to examine Nathan's brain, or when he came
back, Angela's? Not for the power, but to understand other things about
them. Sylar may have been lookign to see if what Noah was saying was
true.

and thus DJensen inscribed ...
> suzee wrote:
>> Michelle Steiner wrote:
>>> "M. Halbrook" <mdhalbrook@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> so elle isn't going to be sylar's baby mama?
>>>> Not anymore it would seem. Tho we're not 100% sure what he did, if
>>>> he finished, or if he stopped and spared her life.
>>> I don't see why he would need to examine her brain; he already got
>>> her power/ability.
>> The addiction/hunger came back?
> I thought it was pretty obvious he was punishing her for her
> involvement, revealed by HRG. He doesn't have an addiction.

Her involvement? The involvement where he kills her dad? Or the other one where he already knew about and accepted her messing with his head and heart back in the day?
--
"... respect, all good works are not done by only good folk. For here, at the end of all things, we shall do what needs to be done."
--till next time, consul -x- <<poetry.dolphins-cove.com>>